About h4831sc
About h4831sc
Blog Article
Your session is about to timeout resulting from inactivity. Click on Okay to increase your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.
I have applied H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There are not several cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem to be often to gravitate to other powders. Having said that, I am unable to express that it will not get the job done. It is simply that some other powders do the job superior for a specified cartridge. By way of example, inside the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and really high-quality groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nevertheless, RL19 was marginally greater in accuracy, however the velocity was practically similar.
What's the primary difference? Compression. With no Serious/major compression related to the extended grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and also the load fell apart.
243, and a few of the loads I've begun with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm going to shoot the IMR7828 loads very first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads show a shotgun pattern! Who knows, I just may find a use for it All things considered.
Thornton, CO Offer of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down way too so get what you'll need in your new load I might suggest. May very well be h4831sc load data all of nothing at all whenever they restock everything Soon but People powders are owning transportation regulation concerns.
Liberalism; The not possible however recognized Idea that it is totally attainable to pick up a turd by the clean up end.
I'm making use of it having a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did nicely but I was somewhat concerned about temp stability. I believe I'm at seventy two grains and acquire all over 2850ish h4831sc fps
and you might want to put money into some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does alter over time. 4831 powder of many years ago is just not same as exactly what is available. that is definitely why an individual seriously interested in reloading properly may have probably the most present load data books to refer to.
I've identified the precise opposite to become real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally correct powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.
Ballistically, this Intense Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, consequently, the designation SC or small Reduce. The shorter, additional compact kernels allow the powder to move throughout the powder measures extra efficiently, assisting to reduce the continuous h4831 vs h4831sc chopping of granules.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are completely various powders, with IMR 4831 getting considerably more rapidly when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Will not treat them as the identical powder, since they most surely are not.
The "SC" stands for Shorter Cut. I haven't discovered a distinction between both powder dut I don't Assume I'd blend them.
rayporter mentioned: i hardly ever seen a change apart from the standard is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Click on to develop...
Naturally, sitting down close to for 20+ years (I do know a man who is still using the H4831 he purchased while in the 60s), means that burn up prices will most likely transform a smidge, and new manufacture things is going to be somewhat unique far too.